The Importance of the Word “All”

Vector image of two human figures with hands i...
Image via Wikipedia

When we see a braggart, we almost go directly to the assumption that all this bragging is rooted in poor self-esteem.  I think it’s not quite right to see this as one-sided problem.   I think it oversimplifies to say that usually these people aren’t, at the same time, suffering from too much self esteem.  Often times, there is one side of the person that believes too much in their own abilities at the same time there is another side of them that believes too little in themselves.

I’ve had reason to ponder an analogous thing, lately.  That thing is our current preoccupation with the self, individuality, personality.   My last couple blog posts have attempted an explanation for why the idea of a personal relationship with Christ can simultaneously be central to our faith but also historically new.  My answer to this question is that our current sociological circumstances place an emphasis on the self, individual, personality.  In order to get to the same understanding of Jesus that past generations have had, we need a new doctrine that helps us figure out the place of our individuality, our  little quirks in the grand scheme of things.

I have stayed neutrally, so far, on the question of whether this change in society is a good thing.  I wanted to explore it a little bit here.

But before I assess it, it seemed like something more needed to be said about how we see the individual in the year 2011.

On the one hand, this is the time in history that most focuses on and applauds the individual, recognizing each person as the natural unit of pretty much everything.   But on the other hand, this is also the age of dehumanization.  We are identified by numbers.  The human race now number in the billions.  Despite possessing technologies that bare the potential to bring us closer together than ever before, we are isolated, and alone.  Perhaps more isolated and alone than ever.

It is like the example of a person who presents the world with their own arrogance.  To a certain extent, they actually are what they appear.  Deeper inside, they are exactly the opposite.  Similarly, we live in this age that almost worships the individual and yet at the same time, as individual, we are struggling as never before, like fish on the sand, trying to breathe the air and hoping somebody will kick us back into the water.

One part of this problem is perhaps that knowing the importance of a thing actually high lights what happens when we don’t get it.   Because we have this knowledge of lead paint, we see everybody telling us to watch out for it, keep your kids away.  It’s not the fact that there is more lead paint than there was a century ago.  The fact of the matter is that there is less.  It’s just that we’re more aware of the dangers now.

In the same way, being a society which has reflected deeply on the needs of the individual, it is natural that we would be more likely to notice– and speak up– when those needs aren’t met.  But I don’t think this accounts for all of the disconnect between whether this age is a dehumanizing or humanizing one.

I think a more significant problem is the fact that focuses at the level of individual denies a certain need: the need for community.  When we take a close-up of a single human being, we are losing what goes on outside the frame.  We’re like a biologist who has become an expert in cells but can’t say much about organs, organ systems, organisms, populations, or ecosystems.

Even if our sociology was as emphasized as our psychology, we wouldn’t suddenly be happy, healthy, and content, though.  Through out history, society has tried to send the message “All you need is X.”  For example, in the midevil era, people were told “All you need to do is follow the rules.”  In the Renaissance and Enlightenmnent people were told “All you need is knowledge.”  Most recently, we’ve been told “All you need is to be yourself.”

We are so easily decieved when the thing that we’re told we need isn’t a bad thing.  Most of us can ignore a person who says “All you need is cocaine.”  Because most of us can see how cocaine is not good for us.  But to an extent, following the rules are a good thing.  To an extent, knowledge is a good thing.  To an extent, being yourself is a good thing.

But none of them are all we need.  Not do we need all three of things.  We need many other things.  But most of all, of course, we need God.

It seems to me that each generation, our faith itself enters into the world by speaking the native language, by speaking to the native concerns.  It begins by saying “People like us need X in order to get close to God.”  We engage in an act of arrogance when we feel like our particular formulation is universal.  At some point, we begin to say “All peeople need X in order to get closer to Goc.”  Then we engage in an act of idolatry, our faith becomes of the world when it forgets the whole point.  At this point, we begin to say “All people need X” and don’t worry about what it is that we need x for.

C.S. Lewis, (I think) wrote that as he spiritually matured, it wasn’t that he thought less of himself, it was just that he thought of himself less.  I think this is a good piece of guidance.  Our uniqunesses are important.  But maybe not as important as we want them to be.

Advertisements

Published by

jeffsdeepthoughts

The stories that speak to our soul begin at a home where things are good. Cinderella is happy with her father. The three little pigs have grown up and are ready to move on. Bilbo Baggins knows his shire. Adam and Eve walk with God in the garden. My story isn’t much different. There was a time and a place where it was so good. There was a community for me. And there was joy. We were filled with a sincere desire to do what God wanted us to do. We possessed explanations and understandings that went a certain distance. We offered security and tradition and laughter. For a lot of years, that was enough. I have this sense that it was also necessary. I have this surety, now, that it certainly wasn’t everything. There were some things that became increasingly problematic as time went by. There was a desire to package things up so very neatly. Sunday morning services were efficient and strategic. Responses to differences of opinion were premeditated. Formula began to feel more important than being real. A real desire for everybody to be one of us, but also a real sense that there is an us, and there is a them. They carried a regret that it has to be this way, but deeper than this regret was a surety that this is how it is. I began to recognize that there was a cost of admission to that group. There were people who sat at the door, collecting it. Those people wished they didn’t have to. But I guess they felt like they did have to. They let some people in, and they left others out. There was a provisional membership. My friends did possess a desire to accommodate people that are different… But it would be best for everyone concerned if they were only a little bit different. I did make many steps forward in this place. Before I went there, there were lies that I believed. Some of the things that I learned there, I still hold on to. But that place is not my home anymore. Those people are not my community anymore. There were times it was hard. I am engaged in a different community now. And I am working hard at finding a place in many different places now, embracing many different kind of families. I don’t always get it right. I am trying and I am learning and I am moving foreward. I have this sense that I am not alone in these experiences. I believe that we are tribe and we are growing. We are pilgrims, looking for a new holy land. Perhaps we won’t settle on the same spot of land. But if you’ve read this far, I am thinking that we are probably headed in the same general direction. I have begun this blog to talk about where my journey is taking me. In every space, we find people who help us along. And maybe we can get to know each other, here. We embrace ideas that provide a structure for the things we believe, and perhaps we can share these too. Maybe we can form a group, a tribe, a community, if we can figure out a way to work through the shadow of these kinds of groups, if we can bigger than the us-and-them ideas that have caused so much trouble in the past. As important as they are, I think the very nature of online interactions will lend itself to something equally powerful. I am stumbling onto these practices that my grandfathers and great grandfathers in the faith engaged in. I am learning about these attitudes and intuitions are so different than the kinds of things we call doctrine today. I don’t know about you, but I am running out of patience, and even interest, in conversations about doctrine. I hope that maybe you’ll share a little something about where your journey is taking you, and maybe our common joys and challenges might help each other along, and we might lift each other up. Thanks for doing this journey with me.

2 thoughts on “The Importance of the Word “All””

  1. Our 7- year old son loves to sing “All you need is Love”. He is a very spiritual little boy – and he means “love” as God.

    I think a major weakness in our time is the focus on the needs of the individual – it is contrary to our call from God. There has never been a problem in getting man to think about himself,it is getting him to think of others, the world around him and his God that is difficult.

    So I agree with my son, all we need is Love (with his understanding that it is God) not quite sure whatJohn Lennon was thinking in the era of “Free Love” – though I expect not quite the same.

    best & blessings, Alexis

    Like

  2. Thanks, Alexis-
    I am quite with you, on the “all we need is love.”
    A tangent: Some years ago, Christianity Today ran a very interesting story about John Lennon’s brief but intense struggle with Christian truth. It seems that he went so far as to actually contact some high-profile pastors with his questions and struggles. This apparently didn’t end up moving him anywhere new… but it’s an interesting ‘what if’ question..

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s